Re: latency & real-time-ness.

From: Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 22:32:41 EST

Next message: Chris Mason: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.x write barriers (updated for ext3)"
Previous message: Mark Richards: "Re: Invalid @home email addresses"
In reply to: J Sloan: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Reply: J Sloan: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

J Sloan wrote:

> Ben Greear wrote
>
>>> Would the low-latency patch help me?
>>>
>>> Yes
>> Excellent, I'm compiling that now....
> Eh?
>
> The full-on low latency patch from Andrew Morton?
>
> You might want to make some diffs available
> since AFIK that would have involved quite a bit
> of hand editing to fix rejects...

I found this patch:
preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre2-ac2-1.patch

It applied cleanly...looks like maybe this isn't
the low-latency patch though now that I look at
it a little closer.

-- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Chris Mason: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.x write barriers (updated for ext3)"
Previous message: Mark Richards: "Re: Invalid @home email addresses"
In reply to: J Sloan: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Next in thread: Robert Love: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Reply: Robert Love: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Reply: J Sloan: "Re: latency & real-time-ness."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:30 EST