Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed

From: Stephen Mollett (molletts@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Mar 03 2002 - 09:44:48 EST

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed"
Previous message: Justin Piszcz: "Re: Recommendations about a 100/10 NIC"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sunday 03 Mar 2002 14:02, Alan Cox wrote:
>> The 2.4 PCI subsystem seems not to handle bogus BIOS-assigned PCI bus
>> numbers well...
> Does the pci=assign-busses option help ?

Yes :)

The CardBus gets assigned a real bus number at last.

I must have been so brain-fried when I was scouring the documentation and
source that I overlooked that one.

Thanks

Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed"
Previous message: Justin Piszcz: "Re: Recommendations about a 100/10 NIC"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Handling of bogus PCI bus numbering - case closed"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:27 EST