Re: [RFC][PATCH] #define yield() for 2.4 scheduler (anticipating O(1))

From: Dan Chen (crimsun@email.unc.edu)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 12:38:04 EST

Next message: James Simmons: "[PATCH] hitfb ported to new api."
Previous message: Pablo Alcaraz: "Re: ext3 and undeletion"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] #define yield() for 2.4 scheduler (anticipating O(1))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 06:13:49PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2002, Bongani Hlope wrote:
>
> > I think Ingo is using sys_sched_yield(); instead of yield. I will still
> > be carefull about it though.
>
> Hmm, I guess it is kind of important to use the same name
> for yielding the CPU that ingo is using ;)

Ingo is using yield() as well.

-- Dan Chen crimsun@email.unc.edu GPG key: www.unc.edu/~crimsun/pubkey.gpg.asc

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Simmons: "[PATCH] hitfb ported to new api."
Previous message: Pablo Alcaraz: "Re: ext3 and undeletion"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: [RFC][PATCH] #define yield() for 2.4 scheduler (anticipating O(1))"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:24 EST