Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Sat Mar 02 2002 - 04:10:23 EST

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Previous message: Florian Weimer: "Re: SSSCA: We're in trouble now"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Mar 01 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> So it would be more straightforward to just allow the queue
> to be grown later on?

I agree with that too. I'm fine with the patch, I'm just a bit worried
about the batch_request vs nr_requests ratio. Are you sure 1/4 is always
a good ratio? In my previous testing, a batch value of more than 32 had
little impact and usually changed things for the worse.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Previous message: Florian Weimer: "Re: SSSCA: We're in trouble now"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: queue_nr_requests needs to be selective"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 21:00:23 EST