Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Thu Feb 28 2002 - 20:14:31 EST

Previous message: Jean Tourrilhes: "[HELP] Failed check_irq_holder() -> ???"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > or (c) have proponents of the inclusion of the O(1) scheduler
> > fix all drivers before having the O(1) scheduler considered
> > for inclusion.
>
> According to find and grep the patch in general use does precisely that
> except for Andrea's yield loops on init kill funnies that still lurk in
> the non x86 parts of rmap. If rmap doesnt need them I guess they should go ?

Absolutely.

Rik

-- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: Jean Tourrilhes: "[HELP] Failed check_irq_holder() -> ???"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:48 EST