Re: Fw: memory corruption in tcp bind hash buckets on SMP?

From: Raghu Angadi (raghuangadi@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Feb 27 2002 - 15:31:01 EST


--- kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > inverted order of insertion into the lists in tw_hashdance() is probably
> > cleaner fix than inverted order of removal..
>
> Why are they not equivalent? Good question? :-)

they are. with "if (!tb->tb) return;" instead of "if (!tb->pprev) return;".
silly me was thinking of literal cut-n-paste invertion of the oder :->

> Alexey

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:39 EST