Re: low latency & preemtible kernels

From: wwp (subscript@free.fr)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2002 - 18:12:46 EST

Next message: Jesper Juhl: "Re: ISO9660 bug and loopback driver bug - a bigger problem then it would appear?"
Previous message: Steve Lord: "Re: Congrats Marcelo,"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: low latency & preemtible kernels"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: low latency & preemtible kernels"
Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: low latency & preemtible kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi J.A.,

On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:55:10 +0100 "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> wrote:

[snip]
> >Try 2.4.18-rc4-jam2 for example. It should apply against 2.4.18 final, too.
> >
>
> Correction: jam2 is O(1)-multi-queue scheduler + low-latency, no
> preeemt there.

Won't 2.4.18-jam1 better?

Regards,

-- 
wwp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesper Juhl: "Re: ISO9660 bug and loopback driver bug - a bigger problem then it would appear?"
Previous message: Steve Lord: "Re: Congrats Marcelo,"
In reply to: J.A. Magallon: "Re: low latency & preemtible kernels"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: low latency & preemtible kernels"
Reply: J.A. Magallon: "Re: low latency & preemtible kernels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:34 EST