Re: Linux 2.4.18 - the missing patch issue

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Mon Feb 25 2002 - 17:39:45 EST

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK"
Previous message: Christine Ames: "RE: [PATCH] block_dev.c: fsync() on close() considered harmful"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Linux 2.4.18 - the missing patch issue"
Next in thread: Jesper Juhl: "RE: Linux 2.4.18 - the missing patch issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 2002-02-25 at 17:34, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> Does anyone know how long this bug has been in the kernel?

For a very short time -- it was introduced around pre6.

> If it's an old bug, 2.4.19-pre1 already has the fix, just like rc4 did...
>
> This *one* bug isn't big enough to hurry, IMO.

Agreed.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: H. Peter Anvin: "Re: Linux 2.4.18 - Full tarball is OK"
Previous message: Christine Ames: "RE: [PATCH] block_dev.c: fsync() on close() considered harmful"
In reply to: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Linux 2.4.18 - the missing patch issue"
Next in thread: Jesper Juhl: "RE: Linux 2.4.18 - the missing patch issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:20 EST