Re: ext3 and undeletion

• Next message: Vincent Bernat: "static arp table doesn't size up ?"
• Previous message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
• In reply to: Steven Walter: "ext3 and undeletion"
• Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: ext3 and undeletion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 09:27:27PM -0600, Steven Walter wrote:
> After unintentionally deleting some file, I noticed what appears to be
> an incosistency (or at least a change) in ext3. Running debugfs and
> executing the command "lsdel", I saw no inodes listed since I last ran
> the partition as ext2. Does ext3 not add its deleted inodes to whatever
> list ext2 does? And can this be fixed without compromising the speed or
> data-integrity of ext3?

This issue has been discussed in the ext3-users mailing few monthes ago:

https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2001-March/000381.html

and more recently :

https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/ext3-users/2002-February/002950.html

-- 
fabrice
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Vincent Bernat: "static arp table doesn't size up ?"
• Previous message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
• In reply to: Steven Walter: "ext3 and undeletion"
• Next in thread: Andreas Dilger: "Re: ext3 and undeletion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 28 2002 - 21:00:13 EST