On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:00:04PM +0000, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:06:48PM -0700, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
> > With preemption this turns into a problem that is easier to solve
> > with a lock or by not having per-cpu caches in the first place --
>
> whilst you're correct (pre-emption has made everything harder), there's
> not much point moaning about it, since it's in linus' kernel now. So
> why bother ?
>
everyone needs a hobby.
-- --------------------------------------------------------- Victor Yodaiken Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company. www.fsmlabs.com www.rtlinux.com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:53 EST