Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4

From: gmack@innerfire.net
Date: Sat Feb 23 2002 - 08:55:50 EST

Next message: Andreas Barth: "kernel-compile-error"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
In reply to: Paul G. Allen: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Paul G. Allen wrote:

> Which compiler, of all of the different versions, generates the most
> stable and fastest code. Compile speed and kernel size is not NEARLY as
> important as performance. So, which compiler fits the bill?
>

icc but only on x86 ;)

-- Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andreas Barth: "kernel-compile-error"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Promise 20269 support?"
In reply to: Paul G. Allen: "Re: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:52 EST