Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository

From: Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 19:35:13 EST

Next message: Balbir Singh: "Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch against mempool"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] Page table sharing"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository"
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:49:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > If you have a pristine tree, adding incremental diffs is:
> > bk import -tpatch ../patch-2.4.X-preY-preZ . && bk tag v2.4.X-preZ
> > Which is what I do for the PPC's kernel.org-only tree(s).
>
> You forgot about setting the proper BK_USER, BK_HOST and
> 'bk comment' commands ;)

heh. Those are rather new things, aren't they? :) Anyhow, the goal for
these tree(s) is to keep the PPC children trees up to date.

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Balbir Singh: "Re: [PATCH] Trivial patch against mempool"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: [RFC] Page table sharing"
In reply to: Rik van Riel: "Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository"
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: Linux 2.4 bitkeeper repository"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:48 EST