Re: [PATCH] bring sanity to div64.h and do_div usage

From: Jes Sorensen (jes@trained-monkey.org)
Date: Fri Feb 22 2002 - 10:34:13 EST


>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> writes:

Jeff> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Why? CONFIG_$ARCH only makes sense if you can enable two
>> architectures in the same build. What does CONFIG_M68K give you that
>> __mc68000__ doesn't provide?

Jeff> 1) it is a Linux kernel standard. all arches save two define
Jeff> CONFIG_$arch.

Ehm, what standard? the standard way has always been ARCH==, CONFIG_PPC
used to be the only place using this and all it did was to make things
uglier and inconsistent.

Jeff> 2) you have two tests, "ARCH==m68k" in config.in and "__mc68000__"
Jeff> in C code. CONFIG_M68K means you only test one symbol, the same
Jeff> symbol, in all code.

If you want to do that, then one should use CONFIG_<ARCH> in the
Makefiles as well.

Jeff> 3) as this thread shows, due to #1, users -expect- that
Jeff> CONFIG_M68K will exist

Ehm, most kernel developers will expect ARCH== in Config.in as thats
how it's always been.

Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 23 2002 - 21:00:42 EST