Re: small IDE cleanup: void * should not be used unless neccessary

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
• Previous message: Larry McVoy: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
• In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: small IDE cleanup: void * should not be used unless neccessary"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: small IDE cleanup: void * should not be used unless neccessary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

> Now I'm confused about the comment on the end of the line.
>
> Should the comment be changed, or should the type be ide_hwgroup_t instead of
> struct hwgroup_s?
>
> Rob

the ide_hwgroup_t typedef is not declared until later in ide.h

Regards,
Rob Radez

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rik van Riel: "Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin"
• Previous message: Larry McVoy: "Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing"
• In reply to: Rob Landley: "Re: small IDE cleanup: void * should not be used unless neccessary"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: small IDE cleanup: void * should not be used unless neccessary"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 21:00:51 EST