On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 14:58, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 01:40:59PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> > We shouldn't engage in wholesale changing of spinlocks to semaphores
> > without a priority-inheritance mechanism. And _that_ is the bigger
> > issue ...
>
> Cool. We can then have the Solaris "this usually doesn't fail on test" priority
> inherit read/write lock. I can hardly wait.
Or, we could do things right and not.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:01:06 EST