Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng

• Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [PATCH] read() from driverfs files can read more bytes"
• Previous message: Janet Morgan: "[RFC] [PATCH] vectored raw io performance improvement"
• Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng"
• Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>> I ran into a somewhat related issue on a 2.2.16 system, where I had an
app that
>> was calling sendto() on 217000 packets/sec, even though the wire could
only
>> handle about 127000 packets/sec. I got no errors at all in sendto, even
though
>> over a third of the packets were not actually being sent.

> That is correct UDP behaviour

Do you think this is the correct PacketSocket/RAW behaviour?
How does one guarantee a send/sendto/write?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: [PATCH] read() from driverfs files can read more bytes"
• Previous message: Janet Morgan: "[RFC] [PATCH] vectored raw io performance improvement"
• Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng"
• Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: want opinions on possible glitch in 2.4 network error reporti ng"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:01:04 EST