Re: The IBM order relaxation patch

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 10:10:37 EST


   From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
   Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:07:39 +0100
   
   I'd rather see rmap go in in its simplest possible form, outperforming the
   current virtual scanning method on basic page replacement performance, rather
   that using the other things we know rmap can do as the argument for inclusion.
   It's for this reason that I'm concentrating on the fork speedup.

Ok, but just keep in mind that failing for < 3 order page allocations
would be a regression from what is in there now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:01:02 EST