Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations

From: Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu)
Date: Mon Feb 04 2002 - 20:34:33 EST

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
Previous message: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
In reply to: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Jussi Laako wrote:

> Thus receiving "CPU hog" process is losing blocks of data.

i understand, and we want to handle such cases perfectly as well.

How much of a CPU hog is your task? What does 'top' show while you are
using your app? (pasting top output here will show the situation.)

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
Previous message: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
In reply to: Jussi Laako: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
Next in thread: Bill Davidsen: "Re: [PATCH] improving O(1)-J9 in heavily threaded situations"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:39 EST