> > I mean I added a usleep() before the poll in s_bsd.c for the undernet
> > 2.10.10 code.
> >
> > timeout = (IRCD_MIN(delay2, delay)) * 1000;
> > + usleep(100000); <- New Line
> > nfds = poll(poll_fds, pfd_count, timeout);
> Why not just add the additional delay into the poll() timeout? It just
> seems like you were not doing enough of a delay in poll().
Wouldn't have the effect. The original point was that adding the usleep()
gives some time for some more file descriptors to become ready before calling
poll(), thus increasing the number of file descriptors poll() can return
per system call. Adding the time to timeout would have no effect.
-- Kevin L. Mitchell <klmitch@mit.edu>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:36 EST