SOCK_PACKET bypasses IPTABLES queue?

From: Xinwen - Fu (xinwenfu@cs.tamu.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 03 2002 - 19:33:41 EST


Rob,
        Another problem:
        Will a packet from SOCK_PACKET socket bypass all the queues of
IPTABLES?

        Thanks!
        

Xinwen Fu

On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

> On Sunday 03 February 2002 01:45 pm, Xinwen - Fu wrote:
> > Hi, All,
> >
> > I want to know how a raw packet passes the chain of iptables.
> >
> > Here are the iptables chains
> >
> > --->PRE------>[ROUTE]--->FWD---------->POST------>
> > Conntrack | Filter ^ NAT (Src)
> > Mangle | | Conntrack
> > NAT (Dst) | [ROUTE]
> > (QDisc) v |
> > IN Filter OUT Conntrack
> >
> > | Conntrack ^ Mangle
> > |
> > | | NAT (Dst)
> >
> > v | Filter
> >
> >
> > So how a raw packet go through these chains?
>
>
> Well, from trial and error and a lot of documentation reading, I eventually
> worked out that a TCP/IP packet basically seems to do this:
>
> --->pre--->forward--->post--->
> | ^
> | |
> v |
> input->local ports->output
>
> I'd like to point out that the last arrow should point from "output" to
> "post", since kmail apparently is not using a fixed with font, and I can't
> figure out how to get it to do so. (I did figure out how to get it to use a
> korean, chinese, or cyrillic encoding, but not monospaced. Sigh...)
>
> So in prerouting, the packet is either forwarded on to the forwarding chain
> (if it's not for this box) or to the input chain (if it's for a daemon on
> this box). Forwarding never sees packets locally generated on this box, they
> go into the output chain and then get sent on to postrouting (which is where
> forwarding also feeds into).
>
> It took a little trial and error to work this out, by the way. It's entirely
> ossibly I'm wrong (since I don't think the above agrees with the
> documentation), but at the same time it works and survives specific behavior
> testing, so... :) The tables are fairly arbitrarily broken into "NAT" tables
> and non-NAT tables. Oh, and one of the chains (output, I think) exists in
> both nat and non-nat versions. To this day, I have no idea why...
>
> > Thanks!!
> >
> > Xinwen Fu
>
> If the above doesn't help, this might:
>
> http://netfilter.samba.org/unreliable-guides/
>
> Rob
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:30 EST