Re: Bitkeeper change granularity (was Re: A modest proposal -- We need a patch penguin)

From: Charles Cazabon (linux-kernel@discworld.dyndns.org)
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 10:12:09 EST


Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
>
> bk clone main temporary-fork
>
> > [hack hack hack]
> > bk commit
> > [hack hack hack]
>
> bk fix -c
>
> > [hack hack hack]
> > bk commit
> > [hack hack hack]
> > bk commit
>
> bk push
>
> All exists, works as described, no changes necessary.

But will the changes which were committed and then reverted from the
temporary tree show up in the main tree after the "push"? There should be no
evidence that they ever took place, so as not to clutter Linus' tree with
changes a developer made and had no intention of sending to Linus.

Charles

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <linux@discworld.dyndns.org>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:22 EST