Re: should I trust 'free' or 'top'?

From: Peter Makholm (peter@makholm.net)
Date: Fri Feb 01 2002 - 14:50:53 EST

Next message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: Continuing /dev/random problems with 2.4"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does"
In reply to: Adam McKenna: "should I trust 'free' or 'top'?"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: should I trust 'free' or 'top'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

adam-dated-1013023458.e87e05@flounder.net ("Adam McKenna") writes:

> Now top, on the other hand, has a very different idea about the amount of
> free memory:

A very different idea? The difference is about 1M if I read it
correctly.

-- 
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode
og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat".
                                -- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ken Brownfield: "Re: Continuing /dev/random problems with 2.4"
Previous message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] Re: crc32 and lib.a (was Re: [PATCH] nbd in 2.5.3 does"
In reply to: Adam McKenna: "should I trust 'free' or 'top'?"
Next in thread: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: should I trust 'free' or 'top'?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 07 2002 - 21:00:17 EST