Re: [sched] [patch] migration-fixes-2.5.3-pre2-A1

From: Manfred Spraul (manfred@colorfullife.com)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 10:40:48 EST

Next message: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering."
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [sched] [patch] migration-fixes-2.5.3-pre2-A1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So i think the P6 documentation is a pessimisation of the true situation,
> and that we can very well have multiple interrupts on the same priority
> level even on older APICs - as long as the local timer interrupt is not
> amongst them.
>
You are right.
I tried to reproduce it (force cpu1 to priority 15, send 4 ipis to
priority 14 from cpu0, check that all arrive), and it seems that the
pIII doesn't drop ipi messages.

--
	Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: yodaiken@fsmlabs.com: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Eric W. Biederman: "Re: Possible Idea with filesystem buffering."
In reply to: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [sched] [patch] migration-fixes-2.5.3-pre2-A1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:45 EST