On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 23:07, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2002-01-17T15:36:54,
> Brian Beattie <alchemy@us.ibm.com> said:
>
> > Probable enhancements to this would include, provideing a method to mark
> > a path to not attempt this crude form of auto recovery and a way to mark
> > a failed path as good. Finally a device wide flag to disable
> > auto-recovery.
...
>
> Combined with the enhancements this makes a lot of sense.
>
> The enhancements are very much required, especially the way to mark a path as
> good again manually.
>
> I would also liks easily parseable /proc file to query the status of a
> multi-path device, including all paths associated with it.
>
>
I have some stuff that uses sysctl, which shows in /proc/sys/... that I
was planning to use.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:30 EST