William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Regardless, various arches want non-multiplicative hash functions and
> they'll be getting them. These hash functions will certainly prove
> useful in getting a broader base to test against. I don't care to have
> a "pet" hash function, only one that is good as possible.
Take a look at these too. Not much information about how good they are,
but they do provide yet more examples to test, if you're testing.
http://www.physik.tu-muenchen.de/lehrstuehle/T32/matpack/html/LibDoc/Strings/strings.html
http://www.physik.tu-muenchen.de/lehrstuehle/T32/matpack/source/Strings/
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:23 EST