Re: [patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 06:27:04 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Calling EISA experts"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 17, 2001"
In reply to: David Weinehall: "[patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part"
Next in thread: David Weinehall: "Re: [patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part"
Reply: David Weinehall: "Re: [patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:12:03AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> It is after all 2.5-time, and hence time for a spring-cleaning.
> These files are still naughty (feel free to fix!):
>
> arch/i386/kernel/mtrr.c

This file in particular needs more than just a spring clean imo.
As extra support was added for the different MTRR lookalikes,
it got messier and messier until it turned into the goop we
have now. Doing a real cleanup on this has been on my TODO for
months now. Hopefully I'll get around to it in the 2.5 timeframe.

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: Calling EISA experts"
Previous message: Dave Jones: "Re: [STATUS 2.5] January 17, 2001"
In reply to: David Weinehall: "[patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part"
Next in thread: David Weinehall: "Re: [patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part"
Reply: David Weinehall: "Re: [patch] getting rid of suser/fsuser for good, first part"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 23 2002 - 21:00:20 EST