Re: low latency versus sched O(1) - and versus preempt

From: Martin Mačok (martin.macok@underground.cz)
Date: Mon Jan 14 2002 - 03:12:06 EST

Next message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Norbert Preining: "ide patch, 2.4.18, boot disk partition, hpt problems"
In reply to: Martin Mačok: "Re: low latency versus sched O(1) - and versus preempt"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 09:06:44AM +0100, Martin Mačok wrote:
> However, comparing full_ll versus O(1)+mini_ll when there's no
> load, I get 10% higher framerate of XMMS/Jess audio/visual plugin.

(forgot to finish the sentence...) higher framerate with full_ll.

but:

> When there is some real load, O(1)+mini_ll performs ~30% higher
> framerate then just full_ll.

-- 
         Martin Mačok                 http://underground.cz/
   martin.macok@underground.cz        http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [2.4.17/18pre] VM and swap - it's really unusable"
Previous message: Norbert Preining: "ide patch, 2.4.18, boot disk partition, hpt problems"
In reply to: Martin Mačok: "Re: low latency versus sched O(1) - and versus preempt"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:44 EST