On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:29:56PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > wow, I always assumed the compiler was smart enough to replace a "/ 512"
> > with a shift.
>
> It is, but there was a bug in the PPC machine description in 3.0.x
> (x=0,1), or something. It's supposedly fixed in later gcc's.
>
> Tom, which gcc version do you have? I thought the fix made it into 3.0.3
> (and from other issues I suspect it's better to upgrade to that anyway for
> kernel compilation).
This was indeed on PPC (I tried x86 w/ the same package but it worked)
running gcc-3.0.3-1 (from Debian/sid). So it seems the fix didn't make
it into a release yet. I guess I'll go hunt down some compiler people
and get them to fix it.
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:35 EST