On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, george anzinger wrote:
> Nathan wrote:
> >
> > Out of sheer curiosity (and this might be a stupid question), is there
> > any effort to make the following lines of development all work together:
> > RML's preempt-kernel and lock-break (and netdev, but that doesn't touch
> > the other stuff), Rick's rmap VM, and the O(1) scheduler? If so, is it
> No, not in concept. Just that they collide in a couple of places and
> need a bit of sorting out. Give us a moment.
I'm adding low latency reschedule points to page_launder_zone()
and refill_inactive_zone() right now ;)
regards,
Rik
-- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swlhttp://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:23 EST