On Tue Jan 08, 2002 at 02:00:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > That's not half a bad idea. If we want a _maintained_ libc for the kernel,
> > having it maintained by kernel folks may make sense. There's nothing
> > stopping us borrowing bits from dietlibc and friends after all.
>
> Why not _work_ with the dietlibc people instead of creating the fifth or
> sixth small libc project ?
And/or the uClibc people....
-Erik
-- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 21:00:22 EST