On Jan 07, 2002 18:46 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I greatly prefer function pointers to [possibly] generic obj management
> code, to storing object sizes. Some filesystem is inevitably going to
> want to do something even more clever with inode allocation. My method
> gives developers the freedom to experiement with inode alloc to their
> heart's desires, without affecting any other filesystem.
Oh, I totally agree. I think stacking filesystems will generally want to
be able to do their own inode-private allocation.
Cheers, Andreas
-- Andreas Dilger http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:37 EST