Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler

From: Richard Henderson (rth@twiddle.net)
Date: Sun Jan 06 2002 - 22:08:01 EST

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: ramdisk corruption problems - was: RE: pivot_root and initrd kern el panic woes"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 02:13:32AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> ... since an 8bit ffz can be done by lookup table
> and that is fast on all processors

Please still provide the arch hook -- single cycle ffs type
instructions are still faster than any memory access.

r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: ramdisk corruption problems - was: RE: pivot_root and initrd kern el panic woes"
Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: LSB1.1: /proc/cpuinfo"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler"
Next in thread: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler"
Reply: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [announce] [patch] ultra-scalable O(1) SMP and UP scheduler"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 21:00:33 EST