On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:35:50PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:15:45 -0800,
> Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> wrote:
> >[talking about kbuild 2.5 speed]
> >Then it does seem reasonable to ask that the new one is at least as fast
> >as the old one.
>
> kbuild 2.4 is fast but inaccurate, kbuild 2.5 is slower but accurate.
> Pick one.
>
> I am sure that I can speed up kbuild 2.5 with a rewrite of the core
> code but I am staying on stable code to send to Linus.
A couple of questions:
a) will 2.5 be as fast as the current system? Faster?
b) what's the eta on 2.5?
-- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:16 EST