Re: [patch] Assigning syscall numbers for testing

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2001 - 15:46:48 EST


> > Negative numbers are safe until Linus has 2^31 syscalls, at which point
> > quite frankly we would have a few other problems including the fact that
> > the syscall table won't fit in kernel mapped memory.
>
> Please leave the allocation of the exact number space to the port
> maintainers discression.

Sorry.. I'm talking about x86 here. Linus is the x86 port maintainer as
well so we have to plan it out that way. For non x86 sure.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 31 2001 - 21:00:10 EST