Re: proc_pid_statm

From: BALBIR SINGH (balbir.singh@wipro.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 23:08:35 EST


I looked at ELF_ET_DYN_BASE and it is defined differently on
different architectures. For example on an i386, it is defined
to be 2GB which is 0x80000000.

On ia64 it is defined as (TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE + 0x1000000).

I would *dare* suggest that since all shared libraries are
mmapped, the correct value to compare against in your patch is
TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE.

On my i386, the ldd output and looking at /proc/<pid>/maps
justifies this.

ldd -d /bin/ls
        libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x4002d000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x40031000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

ld-linux.so.2 is loaded at TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE. Again, let me
remind you that I am speculating, so please correct me if u think
I am wrong.

Comments,
Balbir

William Lee Irwin III wrote:

>It's unclear where the number 0x60000000 comes from. I believe it's
>attempting to anticipate the layout of the process address space, in
>particular the fact that ELF interpreters are mapped starting at
>ELF_ET_DYN_BASE when formatted as dynamic shared objects, (and this
>used to happen around 0x60000000 if I remember old ldd output), and in
>many cases, all dynamic shared objects are mapped at still higher
>addresses. Open-coding this number seems non-portable.
>
>Could someone comment on this?
>
>
>Cheers,
>Bill
>
>
>I think the author may have had this in mind (though this may still
>report inaccurately on a few architectures):
>
>
>--- linux-2.4.17-pre4-virgin/fs/proc/array.c Thu Oct 11 09:00:01 2001
>+++ linux-2.4.17-pre4/fs/proc/array.c Thu Dec 6 13:36:33 2001
>@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>+#include <linux/elf.h>
>
> /* Gcc optimizes away "strlen(x)" for constant x */
> #define ADDBUF(buffer, string) \
>@@ -491,14 +492,13 @@
> share += shared;
> dt += dirty;
> size += total;
>- if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXECUTABLE)
>- trs += pages; /* text */
>- else if (vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN)
>- drs += pages; /* stack */
>- else if (vma->vm_end > 0x60000000)
>- lrs += pages; /* library */
>- else
>- drs += pages;
>+ if (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXECUTABLE) {
>+ if(vma->vm_end > ELF_ET_DYN_BASE)
>+ lrs += pages; /* library */
>+ else
>+ trs += pages; /* text */
>+ } else
>+ drs += pages; /* stack and data */
> vma = vma->vm_next;
> }
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:37 EST