> > Actually that one is various Intel people not me 8)
>
> Wouldn't it be better to see such things proven right in 2.5 first ?
o 2.5 isnt going to be usable for that kind of thing in the near future
o There is no code that is "new" for normal paths (in fact Marcelo
wanted a change for the only "definitely harmless" one there was)
>
> Random things like this still appearing in 2.4 that haven't shown
> up in 2.5 yet is a little disturbing. Ok its small, and there'll be
It isnt viable to do driver work or small test critical work in 2.5 yet. The
same happened in 2.2/2.3 so I'm not too worried
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:36 EST