On Thursday 06 December 2001 12:25 pm, Alan Cox wrote:
> > So has anyone had time to test the Python version 1.5 based CML2 that
> > was posted? Would that make it more acceptable?
>
> For 2.5 its a great leap forward. For 2.4 its irrelevant. Its simply not
> the way stable kernel trees are run, even for people who think they are
> above the rules and traditions
Ooh, I can't resist...
"You mean like Linus?"
(Ducks, runs, looks innocent, runs some more...)
Rob
P.S. Can we seperate "add new subsystem y prime" and "remove old subsystem
y". LIke the new and old SCSI error handling, which have been in the tree in
parallel for some time? Did I hear Eric ever suggest removing the old
configurator for 2.4? Anybody?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST