Re: question about kernel 2.4 ramdisk

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 11:55:02 EST


> simplicity and ramfs with limits is quite a bit less complex than
> shmfs. Of course, ramfs without limits is even simpler which is, I
> believe, why Linus didn't merge the patch in the first place.

Ramfs without limits is useless. It doesn't provide any guidance to an fs
implementor about error handling. Its _too_ simple.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:34 EST