Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 05:15:34 EST

Next message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: /proc/sys/vm/(max|min)-readahead effect????"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Next in thread: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
   Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 09:40:19 +0000

   Doesn't work at all, or just doesn't work with the (current) minimum
   recommended compiler? We have to increase those minima at some point.

The "golden" sparc64 compiler has been in use for years and is what
has the weak problem, and updating it would be a major pain in the
butt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Dalecki: "Re: /proc/sys/vm/(max|min)-readahead effect????"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
In reply to: David Woodhouse: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Next in thread: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Reply: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: [patch] 2.4.16 for pointers to __devexit functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:33 EST