Re: [patch] scalable timers implementation, 2.4.16, 2.5.0

From: Andi Kleen (ak@suse.de)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2001 - 21:32:38 EST


Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> writes:

> The deadlock you're referring to is, I assume, del_timer_sync() called
> inside the timer itself? Can you think of any other dangerous cases?

Common seems to be:

        CPU#0 CPU#1

                             timer fires
spinlock()
                             spinlock() - spinning
del_timer_sync()

-> deadlock.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:32 EST