>>>>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:36:33 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> said:
>> Another concern I have is that, fundamentally, I dislike the idea
>> of penalizing all IA-64 platforms due to one chipset that is,
>> shall we say, "lacking" (i.e., doesn't have an I/O TLB).
Alan> Allow me to introduce to you the concept of CONFIG_ options 8)
Alan> It makes a lot of sense to have a generic IA64 kernel, and an
Alan> IA64 designed by people with a brain kernel.
I think the issue at hand is whether, longer term, it is desirable to
move all bounce buffer handling into the PCI DMA layer or whether
Linux should continue to make bounce buffer management visible to
drivers. I'd be interested in hearing opinions.
--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST