Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@caldera.de)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 07:11:36 EST

Next message: M. Edward Borasky: "Over 4-way systems considered harmful :-)"
Previous message: Mario Mikocevic: "Re: i810 audio patch"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Reply: John Stoffel: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 12:06:12PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
> The CML1 to CML2 conversion comes later, either in 2.5.3 or 2.5.4.

Is the CML2 merge actually agreed on?
I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel hackers are
the same opinion.

Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: M. Edward Borasky: "Over 4-way systems considered harmful :-)"
Previous message: Mario Mikocevic: "Re: i810 audio patch"
In reply to: Keith Owens: "Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Next in thread: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Reply: Eric S. Raymond: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Reply: John Stoffel: "Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST