[patch] Re: paride/Config.in and bool vs. mconfig 0.20

From: Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 06:27:10 EST


On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 05:29:57PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:

> I tried to configure 2.4.17pre2 with mconfig 0.20, it said:
>
> | drivers/block/paride/Config.in: 32: warning: bool command has extra
> | arguments
>
> And rightly so, bool wants the configuration question and the parameter,
> nothing else.
>
> Either that needs some dep_ stuff or it has indeed an extra argument, I
> cannot decide which one is correct, so I'm not providing a patch now.

That option really is just a bool. Here is the fix.

Tim.
*/

--- linux/drivers/block/paride/Config.in.bool Tue Dec 4 11:23:35 2001
+++ linux/drivers/block/paride/Config.in Tue Dec 4 11:24:17 2001
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 dep_tristate ' Shuttle EPAT/EPEZ protocol' CONFIG_PARIDE_EPAT $CONFIG_PARIDE
 if [ "$CONFIG_PARIDE_EPAT" != "n" ]; then
   if [ "$CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL" = "y" ]; then
- bool ' Support c7/c8 chips (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_PARIDE_EPATC8 $CONFIG_PARIDE
+ bool ' Support c7/c8 chips (EXPERIMENTAL)' CONFIG_PARIDE_EPATC8
   fi
 fi
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:23 EST