Re: Is lkml dead?

From: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (ragnar@ragnar-hojland.com)
Date: Mon Dec 03 2001 - 16:43:29 EST

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [BUG] wait_for_devfsd_finished deadlock"
Previous message: gdf: "Re: HPT370 (KT7A-RAID) *corrupts* data - SAMSUNG SV8004H does it as well"
In reply to: Hans-Christian Armingeon: "Is lkml dead?"
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Is lkml dead?"
Reply: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Is lkml dead?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 08:35:04PM +0100, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:

Seems that its hickuping a bit..

-- 
____/|  Ragnar Højland      Freedom - Linux - OpenGL |    Brainbench MVP
\ o.O|  PGP94C4B2F0D27DE025BE2302C104B78C56 B72F0822 | for Unix Programming
 =(_)=  "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer for  | (www.brainbench.com)
   U     chaos and madness await thee at its end."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Gooch: "Re: [BUG] wait_for_devfsd_finished deadlock"
Previous message: gdf: "Re: HPT370 (KT7A-RAID) *corrupts* data - SAMSUNG SV8004H does it as well"
In reply to: Hans-Christian Armingeon: "Is lkml dead?"
Next in thread: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Is lkml dead?"
Reply: Matti Aarnio: "Re: Is lkml dead?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 21:00:22 EST