Re: VM tuning for Linux routers

From: Francois Romieu (romieu@cogenit.fr)
Date: Tue Nov 20 2001 - 16:47:53 EST

Next message: Nick LeRoy: "Re: Swap"
Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Swap"
In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: VM tuning for Linux routers"
Next in thread: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: VM tuning for Linux routers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de> :
> In article <20011118145400.A23181@se1.cogenit.fr> you wrote:
> > Think about forwarding between GigaE and FastE. Think about overflow and
> > bad irq latency. I wouldn't cut buffering at l2 as it averages the peaks.
> > Different trade-offs make sense of course.
>
> I think in that case increasing the buffers is important:
>
> net.core.rmem_max=262144
> net.core.wmem_max=262144

Aren't these only useful to userspace apps ?

-- 
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nick LeRoy: "Re: Swap"
Previous message: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Swap"
In reply to: Bernd Eckenfels: "Re: VM tuning for Linux routers"
Next in thread: Jan Kasprzak: "Re: VM tuning for Linux routers"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:24 EST