[Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??

From: Terje Eggestad (terje.eggestad@scali.no)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2001 - 10:38:45 EST

Next message: vda: "Re: x bit for dirs: misfeature?"
Previous message: Olivier Sessink: "mtrr: base(0xf8000000) is not aligned on a size(0x180000) boundary"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

subject says it all....

I remember there was a discussion and a patch floating around that
implemented SYSCALL/SYSRET, just want to know what happened to it....

-- _________________________________________________________________________

Terje Eggestad terje.eggestad@scali.no Scali Scalable Linux Systems http://www.scali.com

Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE) P.O.Box 70 Bogerud +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE) N-0621 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51 NORWAY _________________________________________________________________________

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: vda: "Re: x bit for dirs: misfeature?"
Previous message: Olivier Sessink: "mtrr: base(0xf8000000) is not aligned on a size(0x180000) boundary"
Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Reply: Pavel Machek: "Re: [Q] was the SYSENTER/SYSCALL fast system calls completed or discared in the end??"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:20 EST