On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Indeed the whole setup.c is a bit confusing, a cpusetup.c file or somesuch
> would make things a bit simpler with maybe an exported function to setup.c
> in the nature of cpu_detect(...). In your 2.5 todo, are you going
> to move the errata/bugs to the same cpusetup file or a seperate one?
The thing is, some identification code needs errata workarounds to happen
(such as the cache sizing code for eg). There comes a point where
splitting stuff up into lots of little files goes too far and becomes
a hindrance rather than a benefit.
When the slicing & dicing happens, I'll take a look at the sizes of
the bits, and see if it's worthwhile.
Dave.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 23 2001 - 21:00:17 EST