The current recovery code fails sometime. This patch performs a
gross stop/start cycle that helps. Thanks to tekjunky@cfl.rr.com and
zzed@cyberdude.com for their patient testing.
--- linux-2.4.15-pre4.orig/drivers/net/fealnx.c Tue Nov 13 16:15:43 2001
+++ linux-2.4.15-pre4/drivers/net/fealnx.c Thu Nov 15 22:13:52 2001
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void set_rx_mode(struct net_devic
static struct net_device_stats *get_stats(struct net_device *dev);
static int mii_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd);
static int netdev_close(struct net_device *dev);
-
+static void reset_rx_descriptors(struct net_device *dev);
void stop_nic_tx(long ioaddr, long crvalue)
{
@@ -887,7 +887,8 @@ static int netdev_open(struct net_device
1 1 0 128
1 1 1 256
Wait the specified 50 PCI cycles after a reset by initializing
- Tx and Rx queues and the address filter list. */
+ Tx and Rx queues and the address filter list.
+ FIXME (Ueimor): optimistic for alpha + posted writes ? */
#if defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__sparc__)
// 89/9/1 modify,
// np->bcrvalue=0x04 | 0x0x38; /* big-endian, 256 burst length */
@@ -1164,12 +1165,12 @@ static void tx_timeout(struct net_device
{
struct netdev_private *np = dev->priv;
long ioaddr = dev->base_addr;
+ int i;
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Transmit timed out, status %8.8x,"
" resetting...\n", dev->name, readl(ioaddr + ISR));
{
- int i;
printk(KERN_DEBUG " Rx ring %p: ", np->rx_ring);
for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++)
@@ -1180,12 +1181,41 @@ static void tx_timeout(struct net_device
printk("\n");
}
- /* Perhaps we should reinitialize the hardware here. Just trigger a
- Tx demand for now. */
+ + dev->if_port = np->default_port;
+ /* Reinit. Gross */
+
+ /* Reset the chip's Tx and Rx processes. */
+ stop_nic_tx(ioaddr, 0);
+ reset_rx_descriptors(dev);
+
+ /* Disable interrupts by clearing the interrupt mask. */
+ writel(0x0000, ioaddr + IMR);
+
+ /* Reset the chip to erase previous misconfiguration. */
+ writel(0x00000001, ioaddr + BCR);
+
+ /* Ueimor: wait for 50 PCI cycles (and flush posted writes btw).
+ We surely wait too long (address+data phase). Who cares ? */
+ for (i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
+ readl(ioaddr + BCR);
+ rmb();
+ }
+
+ writel((np->cur_tx - np->tx_ring)*sizeof(struct fealnx_desc) +
+ np->tx_ring_dma, ioaddr + TXLBA);
+ writel((np->cur_rx - np->rx_ring)*sizeof(struct fealnx_desc) +
+ np->rx_ring_dma, ioaddr + RXLBA);
+
+ writel(np->bcrvalue, ioaddr + BCR);
+
+ writel(0, dev->base_addr + RXPDR);
+ set_rx_mode(dev);
+ /* Clear and Enable interrupts by setting the interrupt mask. */
+ writel(FBE | TUNF | CNTOVF | RBU | TI | RI, ioaddr + ISR);
+ writel(np->imrvalue, ioaddr + IMR);
+
writel(0, dev->base_addr + TXPDR);
- dev->if_port = 0;
- /* Stop and restart the chip's Tx processes . */
dev->trans_start = jiffies;
np->stats.tx_errors++;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:44 EST