Richard Gooch wrote:
> In fact, given the other code in the tree that doesn't conform to
> CodingStyle, it makes sense run lindent on the whole tree and make
> that available. As long as people understand that they should generate
> patches against the real tree, and not the lindented one.
We are slowly Lindenting the -real- tree, actually. So, no, that
doesn't make sense. See my mention of long-term maintainability
earlier...
WRT to other code, devfs is indeed being picked on, because devfs
-clearly- needs other eyes, and devfs is so far from current
CodingStyle.
Readability of devfs is IMHO far more important than the readability of
drivers/scsi/random_isa_driver.c.
-- Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue. MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:33 EST