Re: Big USB speed difference when compiled as module (was Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?)

• Next message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement for 2.4 kernels"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [RFC] bootmem for 2.5"
• In reply to: Tim Pepper: "Big USB speed difference when compiled as module (was Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 02:24:12PM -0800, Tim Pepper wrote:
> BTW: is there a way to do USB sniffing in software in linux? I'd imagine it's
> possible, but just can't find anything that does...

There was a patch on the linux-usb-devel list a few months ago that
contained a patch to do this. You might check the archives if you're
interested.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement for 2.4 kernels"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: [RFC] bootmem for 2.5"
• In reply to: Tim Pepper: "Big USB speed difference when compiled as module (was Re: speed difference between using hard-linked and modular drives?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 15 2001 - 21:00:20 EST